A Heat Packing Controversy
November 16, 2017
There is a gun epidemic in the United States which cannot be resolved by making guns illegal, but by making the regulations and the accessibility much more complex. In 2016, 2,538,397 firearms were processed by Fiscal, 33,594 injury by firearms in 2016, 21,386 intentional self-harm (suicide) by the discharge of firearms, and around 11,000 murders with firearms. According to the National Vital Statistics Reports Vol.65 No.4, June 30, 2016, “It seems clear that the problem is not the legality of a gun, but the accessibility that one has to it, everybody should have the right to own a gun and to protect themselves against whatever evil is out there with a just and righteous motivation.
Now, I would propose that making the background check-a test to determine whether or not you are a viable candidate for gun ownership-be much more deep and complex as mentioned; people with past health issues should go through a long process or just be completely denied the availability to a gun. Suicide is done at a disproportionate rate with guns, people who commit suicide are not mentally stable, so why should guns be allowed to those who only seek to cause malice with it, whether it be self-harm or violence against others.
The regulations that I believe would aid in controlling malevolent intent with a gun are as follows: first, deny access to all those that fail the thorough investigation on their background, past violent history will result in a test that will last several weeks in order to identify their mental state, and if failed then the gun permit should not be given to that individual.
Second, have a strict identity which basically means, in order to use a gun legally you must be the current owner of whose name the gun is registered with, so if you sell the gun (privately) registered under your name to someone else then it be deemed illegal for that person to own the gun unless they put the gun ownership under their name.
Finally, make any type of rifles (semi-automatic or automatic) illegal to those that do not have a special license given to them by an official of a high status, it would limit any normal person from getting one, but of course, it would not stop people from getting it illegally.
You cannot compare America’s system to any other country, it is simply too diverse from any other system to be compared to it. Making guns illegal would not resolve anything, for humans who want to commit murder will either find another way of doing it or use a gun regardless.”To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms…” – Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Member of the First U.S. Senate. Americans would never give up their right to bear arms. It would be helluva of a fight before they did and a helluva of a mistake.
Yunior V • Oct 30, 2018 at 2:09 pm
I like the new staff, they look good. KK
Simon W • Oct 30, 2018 at 2:08 pm
Sounds good! Ya know the CDC reports that 200,000 to 3,000,000 lives are saved through the use of firearms, including those that are not fired during the incident. I’m glad you decided to respond, good day!
Simon W • Nov 28, 2017 at 7:17 am
I agree with a lot of what you’re saying, but I’m not sure you realize that almost if not all handguns are semi-automatic or some version thereof such as dual-action. I presume this is so because you have stated that you want a special licence for semi-automatic and automatic rifles, which makes no sense as people who hunt or shoot at a range are the only ones who would own a rifle and handguns are much more dangerous as they can be concealed easier. I would suggest a special licence on fully-automatic weapons of all kinds a general license for the ownership of all other rifles and guns (essentially an open carry permit,) and a concealed carry permit for states who allow it.
Yunior Vidal • Dec 6, 2017 at 8:48 am
I made this article a while back and my views on this certain topic have definitely changed, but you did not understand what my goal for that license was, it was not to ban assault rifles but rather make them not accessible to the common folk.This simply would not work for a handgun since it is mostly used for self-defense,”National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data indicate that even in the very disadvantageous situation where the robber has a gun, victims who resist
with guns are still substantially less likely to be injured than those who
resist in other ways, and even slightly less likely to be hurt than those
who do not resist at all.”The truth is that crimes are stopped with handguns(or different type of gun) more on average than the people who are killed by handguns (or different type of gun), 11,008 murders via guns happened in 2016, while Data from the NCVS imply that each year there are about 68,000 defensive uses of guns in connection with assaults and robberies, or about 80,000 to 82,000 if one adds in uses linked with household burglaries.There are probably more unreported stopped crimes with guns, a lot more, but to deny someone from getting a handgun just because some of them are semi-automatic is simply too extreme and would solve nothing. A law abiding citizen should have the right to defend themselves with any means necessary.I’m glad you decided to respond, good day!
Yunior Vidal, Contributor • Nov 15, 2017 at 9:03 am
fire^^^^^^^^^
Yunior Vidal, Contributor • Nov 15, 2017 at 9:04 am
If you would like to debate about this irl with me, you are welcome to.